Many years ago I was fascinated with Albert Einstein's theory of relativity because, from my perspective, he was searching to validate through calculated observation the way the universe came into being. Not that I assumed he was trying to invalidate the existence of God via science, but just the opposite. The reasons I took this stance were:

   Albert Einstein was a Jew and Jews, by their religious prominence in the world, are thought to be the people of the God of the Bible. The Bible declares most directly that God created the universe, so it was a direct connection to see Einstein was working to make practical application of creative mystery.

   Long before Einstein there was Sir Isaac Newton who, as a Christian believer, spent much of his life working through the Bible on language codes of prophecy. His work led to a modern discovery of what has been called a "Bible Code" that reveals modern names, dates, and events in detail when the Hebrew characters of Scripture are read in certain patterns of order.

   Sir Stephen Hawking worked for many years calculating the aspects and nature of Black Holes in space with the determination to discover and understand the "Big Bang" that began the universe we live in. His work came to a decision of whether the observer of reality as an event unfolds is either outside, or part of, the event simultaneously. I appreciate his discovery that a black hole does not reach a point of such condensed mass that it explodes. It, rather, just completely disappears as the collected mess of confusion is transferred into another universe where it spreads entirely out into an ordered peace.

   Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, and Stephen Hawking knew mathematics as a language much better than most of us know our native tongue. When I discovered the Hebrew language expresses numerical values in its characters, I realized the Bible itself must in some way be a vast mathematical formula based in what I believed is an inspired word of witness from God, the creator of the universe. I was blessed in an unusual way in addressing the Hebrew language because I had rarely heard it spoken and could read none of it. This allowed a particular noticing of the numerical values of the characters without the distraction of any auditory intrusion in my thoughts and considerations.

   Considering what I thought to be an error in approach - the secular efforts to hold scientific rules of discovery to the isolation of the observer to the observed - Moses and the people of Israel in the wilderness became a pattern for my endeavor to read the mathematics of the Torah. This is where I discovered the connection between the stated will of God and quantified Intent according to the interaction of the observer with the observation. Certainly, the observation will be different depending on the observer in correlation with the creative purposes of the observer and the reason the event is applied to all other events. In each instance of event there is absolute unique difference from every other observer.

   At the same time all observers and observations are the same in the sharing of the process. So, as each is separate and distinct, each is affected completely by the others. When there is disharmony and disarray, an obstinate refusal to accept interaction with the intended event, the event itself changes away from its original purpose and takes on a new purpose, even though the original purpose still exists. When the observer remains uninvolved with the observation, and therefore loses his or her place to be observed as part of the observation, the observation loses its intended purpose for which the existence of light came to be. This "creates" a darkness that is absolutely finite and absolutely infinite at the same time because the purpose and the intent are counteracted through the existence of the act.

   God is not a haphazard design and builder architect/engineer working for a mega galactic corporation. He is as consciously present in the minutest particle we cannot imagine as He is in the vast reaches of the universe beyond our knowing. All time is simultaneously in His hands. Aside from the physical mechanics of Creation, God Himself provided all we can know and observe to exist so that our world may have its place for us to reach out to Him. That is when I thought of my family in an ironic way. The Theory of Relativity, coincidentally (?) has as a root the meaning to 'relate' or 'relationships' or 'relatives'... The structure of the family, as God designed it to be, has an intent of purpose far beyond any of the misunderstandings and selfish manipulations many people believe is their right.

   But, He is a forgiving God and has the infinite grace of Absolute Light to clearly vanquish completely a black hole of darkness that may be a part of any of us that does not belong. This is done by accepting in appreciation our awareness of personal existence as a gift of purpose from the Source of the universe (where, in marriage between a man and a woman, there is a shared light of established awareness), instead of working to establish each our own wisdom of experiences to exist as a right of self-determination in the contrived use of ourselves and those around us.

   There is no such thing as the past and the future. There is only an accepting and rejecting of proper and improper associations, respectively.

   Gratitude in faith for who God proclaims we are in Who we accept, allows an honest contrition of spiritual reliability in freedoms of positive expression; while contempt in doubt for who we reject over what we believe ourselves and others are, binds us to a haughty calculating negative exasperation. Both conditions find a common sense of personal fulfillment: The first works to improve circumstances to validate responsible views. The second rejects circumstances to find alternative views. The difference is in whether we deem people as loved by God in Christ, or rejected by God in their difficulties.