|
To view the below equation it must be selected
(highlighted):
I = O
3
Where 'I' signifies
"Intent" and 'O' signifies "All inclusive" and "All exclusive".
The Time/Space provision for Linear Physical Existence is ultimately 'bound', by the Will
of our Creator, where the scientific forcing of the material purpose of probabilities becomes 'entangled'.
Research:
(The
above should be sufficient to point anyone interested in the right direction. The actual formulas are not posted to value
precautions.)
Expository
Many years ago I was fascinated with Albert Einstein's theory
of relativity because, from my perspective, he was searching to validate through calculated observation the way the universe
came into being. Not that I assumed he was trying to invalidate the existence of God via science, but just the opposite. The
reasons I took this stance were:
Albert Einstein was a Jew and Jews, by their religious prominence
in the world, are thought to be the people of the God of the Bible. The Bible declares most directly that God created the
universe, so it was a direct connection to see Einstein was working to make practical application of creative mystery.
Long before Einstein there was Sir Isaac Newton who, as
a Christian believer, spent much of his life working through the Bible on language codes of prophecy. His work led to a modern
discovery of what has been called a "Bible Code" that reveals modern names, dates, and events in detail when the Hebrew characters
of Scripture are read in certain patterns of order.
Sir Stephen Hawking worked for many years calculating the
aspects and nature of Black Holes in space with the determination to discover and understand the "Big Bang" that began the
universe we live in. His work came to a decision of whether the observer of reality as an event unfolds is either outside,
or part of, the event simultaneously.
I appreciate his discovery that a black hole does not reach
a point of such condensed mass that it explodes. It, rather, just completely disappears as the collected mess of confusion
is transferred into another universe where it spreads entirely out into an ordered peace. Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, and
Stephen Hawking knew mathematics as a language much better than most of us know our native tongue.
When I discovered the Hebrew language expresses numerical
values in its characters, I realized the Bible itself must in some way be a vast mathematical formula based in what I believed
is an inspired word of witness from God, the creator of the universe. I was blessed in an unusual way in addressing the Hebrew
language because I had rarely heard it spoken and could read none of it.
This allowed a particular noticing of the numerical values
of the characters without the distraction of any auditory intrusion in my thoughts and considerations. Considering what I
thought to be an error in approach - the secular efforts to hold scientific rules of discovery to the isolation of the observer
to the observed - Moses and the people of Israel in the wilderness became a pattern for my endeavor to read the mathematics
of the Torah.
This is where I discovered the connection between the stated
will of God and quantified Intent according to the interaction of the observer with the observation. Certainly, the observation
will be different depending on the observer in correlation with the creative purposes of the observer and the reason the event
is applied to all other events. In each instance of event there is absolute unique difference from every other observer.
At the same time all observers and observations are the
same in the sharing of the process. So, as each is separate and distinct, each is affected completely by the others. When
there is disharmony and disarray, an obstinate refusal to accept interaction with the intended event, the event itself changes
away from its original purpose and takes on a new purpose, even though the original purpose still exists.
When the observer remains uninvolved with the observation,
and therefore loses his or her place to be observed as part of the observation, the observation loses its intended purpose
for which the existence of light came to be. This "creates" a darkness that is absolutely finite and absolutely infinite at
the same time because the purpose and the intent are counteracted through the existence of the act.
God is not a haphazard design and builder architect/engineer
working for a mega galactic corporation. He is as consciously present in the minutest particle we cannot imagine as He is
in the vast reaches of the universe beyond our knowing. All time is simultaneously in His hands. Aside from the physical mechanics
of Creation, God Himself provided all we can know and observe to exist so that our world may have its place for us to reach
out to Him.
That is when I thought of my family in an ironic way. The
Theory of Relativity, coincidentally (?) has as a root the meaning to 'relate' or 'relationships' or 'relatives'... The structure
of the family, as God designed it to be, has an intent of purpose far beyond any of the misunderstandings and selfish manipulations
many people believe is their right.
But, He is a forgiving God and has the infinite grace of
Absolute Light to clearly vanquish completely a black hole of darkness that may be a part of any of us that does not belong.
This is done by accepting in appreciation our awareness of personal existence as a gift of purpose from the Source of the
universe (where, in marriage between a man and a woman, there is a shared light of established awareness), instead of working
to establish each our own wisdom of experiences to exist as a right of self-determination in the contrived use of ourselves
and those around us.
There is no such thing as the past and the future. There
is only an accepting and rejecting of proper and improper associations, respectively. Gratitude in faith for who God proclaims
we are in Who we accept, allows an honest contrition of spiritual reliability in freedoms of positive expression; while contempt
in doubt for who we reject over what we believe ourselves and others are, binds us to a haughty calculating negative exasperation.
Both conditions find a common sense of personal fulfillment:
The first works to improve circumstances to validate responsible views. The second rejects circumstances to find alternative
views. The difference is in whether we deem people as loved by God in Christ, or rejected by God in their difficulties.
God designed a graceful balance in humanity that compliments
acceptance with rejection. The contradiction finds an intermeshed agreement where exclusive single family integrity in privacy
respects the service right of a mutual societal discourse for universal safety, wellbeing, and prosperity.
Without the strength of family unity bound by the core of
authority in respect for the holy (set apart) bonds of matrimony, unconstrained social variance creates a pandemonium of intrusive
turmoil.
Where it all began
The Bible says that all things are in, of, and by the Word
of God. God spoke and out of nothing came into being all that is. There is a Tree of Life, Jesus Christ, Who produces the
fruits of God’s desire for Creation. Adam and Eve, married by God, lived in harmony, trust, and respect with God in
the Garden of Eden.
The fall of humanity to adversity against God’s design
and desire in the Truth of His Word came through an intrusion of a gossiping anti-word of jealous envy expressed in Satan’s
lying words to Eve: “Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?” Here, Satan spoke to Eve
addressing the same matters of life and death that God had addressed with Adam and Eve through a conversational word.
God’s intent of heart is directly transparent in the
speaking of His Word. But, the adversary’s intent in his pandering to people’s instinctual emotions is hidden.
Since a word of knowledge contains the intent of the heart, Eve was deceived by her trust that Satan was speaking from a legitimate
position of authority.
What may on the surface seem to be an honest witness of
God’s own Word to Adam and Eve is Satan’s exploitation of the respect in Authority God had with Adam and Eve,
and the respect of authority Adam had with Eve to God. Challenging her to challenge
God’s Authority through disrespecting their obedience to God through Adam, Satan prompted Eve to respond to him through
her own sense of indignation with:
“We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, ‘Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall
ye touch it, lest ye die.’” In this, Eve gave up her respect to Adam’s authority through her initial attempt
to counteract Satan’s disrespect to God.
Through Satan’s appeal to her curiosity, he thus undermined
Eve’s dependence to rely in Adam, for God’s sake, by tempting her pride of personal protectionism in defending
herself (which was actually of Adam in God). Satan then took authority directly from Eve’s independently expressed will
by responding with the direct lie:
“Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in
the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Satan’s
ulterior motives through gossip, the stolen attentions of the Word of living, was to use a host of compliance between Creation
and his desire to have things his perverted way.
His primary and continuing force of attack is based in the
avenues of communication simply because all things true are constantly from the Word of God Who is not situational facts and/or
circumstances, but is the Power of Existence itself (or Himself).
Aside from God’s Holy Spirit of Truth flowing out
from the inner man through faith in Christ, when a person makes a statement he or she believes is true, it either is or is
not true no matter what anyone believes. When another person agrees with the first person’s statement, he or she may
believe it to be true because of their acceptance of the proclamation’s content.
To say, “That’s true!” in response is
untrue to say and not respectful to the belief the first speaker believes, nor is it respectful to the first speaker. Also,
the second person disrespects (debases) his or her self the same way by declaring the shared belief to be true. More importantly,
telling another their belief is ‘true’ denies that God Himself holds the full franchise on what is true and what
is not.
“This is what I believe to trust God with my efforts.”
is an appropriate understanding when sharing one’s belief. “I agree.” or “I disagree.” are appropriate
as responses and gives all involved the opening to reality that automatically dissolves ‘right-over-wrong’ or
‘wrong-against-right’ self-perpetuating battles of will in worldly knowing.
Anyone may be speaking actual truth or what is believed
to be true the same, while recognition of the difference of Christ’s Truth from the knowledge of good and evil depends
entirely in each person’s trust through faith in God through Jesus Christ; every time, all the time, anyone and everyone
speaks.
The structure of God’s Kingdom, of which all people
belong to Christ whether they believe so or not, is founded in loyalty. This is why who someone is is not what he or she does.
Who anyone is is why he or she does what they do. This loyalty of Royalty is from God in and through Jesus Christ, the King
of kings and Lord of lords.
A man’s word is sure and true in the Truth of the
Spirit of God when he is loyal to who he is concerning his wife, children, family, and others – in that order unto God
through Christ. It is not the spoken word of a man or woman itself that is true.
It is to whom each is loyal to for God’s sake that
makes his or her speaking true in representing and respecting God in Christ, in the man, in the woman, in their children,
in their family, in their community that gives one’s justifying credence to Creation.
Properly reversing that order, Community is of the family,
Family is of a marriage, and Marriage is of God; all in tiered respect for a word of promise from above.
"An
ounce of prevention is truly worth a pound of cure."
(This
ancient phrase is referring to British currency denotations where the “ounce of prevention” speaks of God’s
admonition to Adam and Eve not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The “pound of cure”, being
a much larger cost, speaks of the Cross and Resurrection of Jesus Christ where He paid the full price for our redemption.
Any efforts to manipulate corrections through hardship to gain ‘development through sorrow and pain’ are destructive
to the lives of the prey as well as the facilitating administrators – and, in the end, are deeds in contradiction to
the Gospel of Salvation.)
Click above for living instructions
Warning: Strong Content
"Active faith is like a light globe. It takes two steadily connected wires for
continuous glowing."
|
